IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v8y2016i2p109-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification by majority voting in feature partitions

Author

Listed:
  • Hari Seetha
  • M. Narasimha Murty
  • R. Saravanan

Abstract

Nearest neighbour classifier and support vector machine (SVM) are successful classifiers that are widely used in many important application areas. But both these classifiers suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Nearest neighbour search, in high dimensional data, using Euclidean distance is questionable since all the pair wise distances seem to be almost the same. In order to overcome this problem, we propose a novel classification system based on majority voting. Firstly, we partition the features into a number of blocks and construct a classifier for each block. The majority voting is then performed across all classifiers to determine the final class label. Classification is also performed using non-negative matrix factorisation (NNMF) that embeds high dimensional data into low dimensional space. Experiments were conducted on three of the benchmark datasets and the results obtained showed that the proposed system outperformed the conventional classification using both k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. The proposed system also showed better performance when compared with the classification performance of 1NN and SVM classifier using NNMF-based dimensionally reduced data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hari Seetha & M. Narasimha Murty & R. Saravanan, 2016. "Classification by majority voting in feature partitions," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 109-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:109-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76509
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:109-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.