IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v5y2013i3p229-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study on the representation of cognitive decision-making within business process

Author

Listed:
  • Andreia Carneiro Teixeira Dias Pereira
  • Flávia Maria Santoro

Abstract

Business process success depends on how its participants perform their tasks. A participant's ability, knowledge and experience of a participant are decisive to carry out one's tasks and deal with eventual changes. Understanding each business process activity, it is also relevant to understand the contextual information in particular situations. However, contextual information should be available to promote this understanding. In this sense, cognitive decision-making process is an important contextual element, as it could help to describe how an activity has been performed. Nevertheless, making this contextual information available still represents a challenge for the difficulty in expliciting an individual mental process or the rationale of a decision. We present an approach for capturing and representing cognitive decision-making process as contextual knowledge involving business process activities and discuss case study results.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreia Carneiro Teixeira Dias Pereira & Flávia Maria Santoro, 2013. "A case study on the representation of cognitive decision-making within business process," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 229-244.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:229-244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:229-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.