IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v4y2012i4p350-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spare parts criticality evaluation using hybrid multiple criteria decision making technique

Author

Listed:
  • Sarojini Jajimoggala
  • V.V.S. Kesava Rao
  • Satyanarayana Beela

Abstract

Criticality evaluation of spare parts is very important for controlling the spare parts inventory. The service levels that are specified consequent to the criticality evaluation serve as one of the inputs enabling smooth operation of production facilities. Systematic criticality evaluation of spare parts is the key to effective control of spare parts inventory systems. In order to deal with this problem, the criticality of the spare parts (SPs) must be confirmed. There are many factors to be considered as a part of the criticality of spare parts for maintenance activities. Consequently, evaluation procedures involve several objectives and it is often necessary to compromise among possibly conflicting tangible and intangible factors. For these reasons, MCDM has been found to be a useful approach to solve this kind of problem. In the present work, a three phase hybrid model is developed for the evaluation of criticality of the spare parts. The first stage involves identifying the criteria. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria using fuzzy ANP, and then finally ranking of spare parts using fuzzy TOPSIS.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarojini Jajimoggala & V.V.S. Kesava Rao & Satyanarayana Beela, 2012. "Spare parts criticality evaluation using hybrid multiple criteria decision making technique," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 350-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:350-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50377
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:350-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.