IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v4y2012i1p63-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A linguistic similarity method in case-based reasoning for performance evaluation in Tunisian banking sector

Author

Listed:
  • Diala Dhouib
  • Habib Chabchoub

Abstract

The performance evaluation of banks is an essential task in the determination of banks' capabilities to compete in the sector. The conventional method - a calculation by intuition - for devising such evaluations is often inaccurate. To overcome these difficulties, this paper proposes that case-based reasoning (CBR) could be employed to provide performance evaluations from historical banks of Tunisian banking sector. The main objective of these evaluations is to transform data and statistics into synthetic information easy to understand by several groups of people in the banking domain such as creditors, investors and stakeholders. The aim of this study is to propose a linguistic similarity method in the retrieval mechanism of CBR to evaluate the banks' performances. By this way, the two-tuple linguistic representation model is integrated in the proposed model. The weights of criteria are determined based on the opinions of experts using the Choquet integral to model interactions between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Diala Dhouib & Habib Chabchoub, 2012. "A linguistic similarity method in case-based reasoning for performance evaluation in Tunisian banking sector," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 63-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:63-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45128
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:63-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.