IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v1y2009i4p411-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The threat of outsourcing US ports operation to any terrorist country supporter: a case study using fault tree analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio F. Blos
  • Hui-Ming Wee
  • Leopoldo Eduardo Cardenas-Barron

Abstract

The possibility of any chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) weapon and/or material to be used in a shipment as a terrorist attack is considered a threat. The objective of this case study is to use fault tree analysis (FTA) to assess the threat to outsource the US ports to any terrorist country supporter. Thus, it was suggested a two-stage process to achieve this: problem formulation to define and rank scenarios, then quantitative risk assessment of selected, more highly ranked, scenarios. The quantitative risk assessment used here is considering two bioterrorist scenarios (projecting the past): the actual 1984 Rajneeshee incident in Oregon and a hypothetical release of oral anthrax into the food supply system. It is worthwhile to highlight that we have demonstrated with the use of FTA that a biological case scenario is possible if a terrorist attack happen.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio F. Blos & Hui-Ming Wee & Leopoldo Eduardo Cardenas-Barron, 2009. "The threat of outsourcing US ports operation to any terrorist country supporter: a case study using fault tree analysis," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 411-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:1:y:2009:i:4:p:411-427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=27760
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:1:y:2009:i:4:p:411-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.