IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v1y2009i3p265-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rule randomisation and its application to logic-based workflow verification

Author

Listed:
  • Qianhui Liang
  • Stuart H. Rubin

Abstract

Workflow verification has been a well-studied research topic during the past few years. Theorem proof-based approaches to workflow verification have become popular due to several advantages including being based on formal characterisation with rigorous and unambiguous inference mechanisms. However, a common problem with these inference mechanisms is combinatorial explosions, which forms a major performance hurdle to workflow verification systems based on inference. In this paper, we study how randomisation enables reuse and reduces processing time in logic-based workflow verification approaches. In particular, we look at a propositional logic-based workflow verification technique. For the logic inference rules, which are used to infer new truthful propositions from existing truthful propositions in this logic, we apply randomisation to the inference rules after each verification task such that new inference rules, reflecting the componentised verification, are added to the inference rule sets. We also review the savings gained by verifying a workflow pattern and provide a theoretical analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianhui Liang & Stuart H. Rubin, 2009. "Rule randomisation and its application to logic-based workflow verification," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 265-281.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:265-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=27655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:265-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.