IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v15y2023i4p345-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining a model for eliminating organisational lying: a grounded theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Hakkak
  • Khaled Nawaser
  • Mohammad Jalali
  • Samaneh Ghahremani
  • Ali Vafaei-Zadeh
  • Haniruzila Hanifah

Abstract

The present study has been implemented to generate a theory in the field of organisational lying for better understanding and explaining the phenomenon in organisations. The subject of lying has been widely discussed in other fields such as psychology. However, little attention has been paid to this issue in the field of management and organisation. Therefore, it seems that this paper can open a new horizon to research on lying within the organisation. The research method is qualitative and based on the grounded theory. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection and Strauss and Corbin method and paradigmatic model were adopted for data analysis. A total of 21 interviews were conducted with managers and experts who were familiar with the issue and context using judgmental and snowball sampling technique. The results of the analysis of the data obtained from the interviews during the open, axial and selective coding processes led to the formation of a grounded theory concerning the organisational lying based on which the purposeful lying, blind lying, and silent lying were introduced as the basic concepts of the organisational lying model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Hakkak & Khaled Nawaser & Mohammad Jalali & Samaneh Ghahremani & Ali Vafaei-Zadeh & Haniruzila Hanifah, 2023. "Determining a model for eliminating organisational lying: a grounded theory approach," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 345-365.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:345-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134789
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:345-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.