IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v14y2022i1p15-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human decision making modelling for gambling task under uncertainty and risk

Author

Listed:
  • Nimisha Gupta
  • Mitul Kumar Ahirwal
  • Mithilesh Atulkar

Abstract

In this paper, modelling of human decision making process and comparison among various reinforcement learning (RL) techniques with utility functions has been performed. Iowa gambling task (IGT) is used to collect real time data to understand and model the decision making (DM) process involving uncertainty, risk or ambiguity. Performance of models is evaluated based on their mean square deviation (MSD) value. This helps to predict the probability of the next choice that lead to the selection of the advantageous deck as compared to disadvantageous one. Along with that, the deck selection pattern between male and female with the learning process of the participants were also analysed. By comparing the MSD value of various RL models, it is found that the MSD value of DM model consists of prospect utility (PU)-decay reinforcement learning (DRI) with trial dependent choice (TDC) rule is best.

Suggested Citation

  • Nimisha Gupta & Mitul Kumar Ahirwal & Mithilesh Atulkar, 2022. "Human decision making modelling for gambling task under uncertainty and risk," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 15-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:15-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=122723
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:15-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.