IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v5y2012i4p438-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and evaluation of risk in agribusiness: an empirical study on vegetable sector in India

Author

Listed:
  • Rajeev Kumar Panda
  • Tushar Kanti Das
  • Sreekumar

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating the risk involved in agricultural business in India from farmer's perspective. This study is carried out in Bargarh district of the state called Orissa located in eastern part of India. Agricultural diversification in the state of Orissa in general and Bargarh district in particular is highly intensified towards vegetables production which gives farmers better return on investment. But there are some serious risks involved in the business which affect the spirit of the farmers towards vegetable business. This paper tries to explore the perception of farmers towards the risk variables influencing vegetable production and marketing in the district of Bargarh. This study reveals five major risks in vegetable farming namely investment risk, socio-economic risks, environmental risk, production risk and marketing risk. These risks make the propositions more complex as perceived by the farmers. This study recommends risk management strategies such as future contracting, crop insurance, contract farming, etc. if implemented properly may mitigate the above-said risks and bring efficiency in the system. The empirical findings may be useful for the stakeholders involved in agricultural business.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajeev Kumar Panda & Tushar Kanti Das & Sreekumar, 2012. "Identification and evaluation of risk in agribusiness: an empirical study on vegetable sector in India," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 438-457.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:5:y:2012:i:4:p:438-457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47414
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:5:y:2012:i:4:p:438-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.