IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v4y2011i4p377-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management control insights from the Mahabharata

Author

Listed:
  • Keyur Thaker

Abstract

The effective management control or strategy execution requires striking balance and managing tensions across the organisation (Simmons, 2000). Merchant (2002) classifies the cause of execution failures as imbalance on three different fronts, namely, direction, motivation (misalignments) and ability or personal limitations. The victory of the Pandavas over the Kauravas in the Indian epic 'Mahabharata' dated some 3000 BC; despite arguably superior ability of the latter provides interesting insights on how those causes were managed. The practices and preaching of Sri Krishna, the mentor in the epic Mahabharata, offer some interesting lessons on how the causes of management control failure in Kauravas led to the victory of Pandavas. Pandavas' camp demonstrated the balance on direction, motivation and ability (DMA) framework identified here, and thus created a winning organisation. The mind–body diagnosis framework (Sathe and Smart, 1997), a powerful tool to 'winning organisation', is quite close to this. The framework also compares well with Krishna–Arjuna framework a.k.a. KAF (Parashar, 2008) that right vision and focused action lead to the victory amongst equal, and focused action requires competent people and compatible team. The win without fighting strategy of Sun Tzu (Ma, 2003) is as well demonstrated and comparable with the DMA framework and the Mahabharata.

Suggested Citation

  • Keyur Thaker, 2011. "Management control insights from the Mahabharata," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 377-389.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:4:y:2011:i:4:p:377-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=40957
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:4:y:2011:i:4:p:377-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.