IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v35y2025i1p96-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prominent behavioural biases affecting investment decisions: a systematic literature review with TCCM and bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shubhangi Gautam
  • Pardeep Kumar

Abstract

Behavioural finance since its inception is centred on bridging the gap between psychology and finance. The study aims to discover the most common behavioural biases in investment decision-making and to find new emerging dimensions for further research. This research employed the PRISMA guidelines to finalise the research studies for final review. The review paper adopted the TCCM 'a theory development, context, characteristics, and methodology' and bibliometric approach to analyse the 'Scopus-indexed' research publications. The study establishes that behavioural biases are inescapable; and they are bound to influence individuals, corporates, financial analysts, or other investors' investment choices, whether positively or negatively. The research concludes that prospect theory, heuristics, and herding are three categories of biases that mostly influence and impact the opinions of prospective investors. Moreover, the relationships of behavioural finance with neurofinance and emotional intelligence are recognised as the most promising emerging areas for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shubhangi Gautam & Pardeep Kumar, 2025. "Prominent behavioural biases affecting investment decisions: a systematic literature review with TCCM and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(1), pages 96-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:96-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=146443
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:96-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.