IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v31y2024i3p274-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception and level of satisfaction of small tea growers towards institutional role: a district level case study

Author

Listed:
  • Anitabh Kakoty
  • Ratan Kaurinta

Abstract

The present study has an aim to empirically identify the differences of perception and level of satisfaction among the small tea growers (STGs) with an acreage of 10.12 ha or below of Golaghat district of Assam. The STGs in Assam has contributed to the production of green leaves, which is more than 50% of total green leaf output of the state. It has become pertinent for them to climb up to a strategic stage with a voice as the whole system is reaching maturity and they need to attain a vantage point to access the benefits from administration and increase financial inclusiveness. An analytical study was conducted with structured interviews among the STGs in the line of different dimensions. The results obtained show a presence of a distinct gap in between perception and satisfaction level of STGs, which affirms the scope of improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Anitabh Kakoty & Ratan Kaurinta, 2024. "Perception and level of satisfaction of small tea growers towards institutional role: a district level case study," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(3), pages 274-290.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:274-290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137279
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:274-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.