IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v27y2022i2p251-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking employee engagement, job stress and perceived organisational support to organisational commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Manisha Sharma

Abstract

In the recent past, the term organisational commitment has been studied by researchers a number of times, as it has a high practical relevance and importance in the organisational setup. Previous researches show that organisational commitment has an important role as it has a direct relation to employee performance, employee loyalty, employee turnover, competitive advantage, etc. This paper evaluates the impact of the factors such as employee engagement, job stress and perceived organisational support on organisational commitment in the Indian context. For this purpose, the data was collected through an online survey. Two hundred questionnaires were received back from the professionals and executives working in various corporate engaged in HR consultancies and services in Noida NCR. The collected data were analysed through SPSS 22 and SEM was used through Amos version 22. The findings suggest that the work engagement has a significant positive effect on organisational commitment. As expected, job stress has a significant negative effect on organisational commitment. Whereas, perceived organisational support has a significant positive effect on organisational commitment. This study provides an insight to develop policies in order to create and retain competent and committed workforce in the various corporations of India.

Suggested Citation

  • Manisha Sharma, 2022. "Linking employee engagement, job stress and perceived organisational support to organisational commitment," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(2), pages 251-269.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:27:y:2022:i:2:p:251-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=126141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:27:y:2022:i:2:p:251-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.