IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v24y2021i2p260-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees preferences regarding work-fun activities: a study of NCR employees

Author

Listed:
  • Neha Gupta
  • Karamvir Sheokand

Abstract

Work fun is a phenomenon which has not been studied much till now and a lot of research work is being dedicated to this aspect these days. The managers over the world are discovering new ways of adding fun in their work environment as it benefits both the employees and the organisation. According to several studies, a fun working environment adds to the employee as well as organisational productivity while reducing stress and turnover intentions among employees. There are a lot of different activities that can be used by an organisation to add fun to work, but all activities are not considered equal by different strata of the employees in doing so. This paper studies exactly what activities are considered as fun activities by these different sets of employees working in the IT sector in the NCR, depending on their demographic profiles, like, gender, age group, family status, nature of job, duration of job, etc. It also studies the respective variations in preferences regarding these activities among employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Neha Gupta & Karamvir Sheokand, 2021. "Employees preferences regarding work-fun activities: a study of NCR employees," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(2), pages 260-282.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:260-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:260-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.