IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v16y2018i2p170-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blinded or branded? Effect of brand cues on customer evaluation of store brands versus national brands in an emerging market

Author

Listed:
  • Rashmi
  • Hamendra Kumar Dangi

Abstract

The study attempts to understand the importance of brand knowledge (through extrinsic cues) in determining quality perception and brand preference for store brands and national brands through an experiment using 93 subjects and 744 evaluations for four products. Results suggest that extrinsic cues displayed by products drive consumers' (negative) evaluation of store brands by overshadowing their intrinsic characteristics. This observation is especially remarkable for products categories characterised by social consumption and high brand differentiation. Results indicate that shoppers' willingness to purchase store brands is dictated by their perception of private label brands offering value-for-money. Results also show that consumers assign better evaluation to national brands after knowing their identity. This is reversed in the case of store brands whose evaluation got worse after knowledge of brand. Store brands fare better than non-brands when consumers evaluate the two after knowing their sources. The results hold implications for retailers and manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rashmi & Hamendra Kumar Dangi, 2018. "Blinded or branded? Effect of brand cues on customer evaluation of store brands versus national brands in an emerging market," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 170-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:16:y:2018:i:2:p:170-205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90089
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:16:y:2018:i:2:p:170-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.