IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v13y2016i3p310-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of local area banks in India: an empirical study (2003-2012)

Author

Listed:
  • Padmasai Arora
  • Hitesh Arora

Abstract

Conceived as an alternative source of innovation and credit to marginal and small agricultural farmers and retail business in remote rural areas through integrating local markets, the viability of local area banks (LABs) in the Indian banking sector has been a matter of debate ever since their inception in the late '90s. This paper undertakes the first ever comprehensive assessment of the performance of LABs tracking their origin, role and performance during the ten-year period from 2003-04 to 2012-13. Important financial performance indicators of LABs are observed vis-á-vis scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) and regional rural banks (RRBs) using ratio analysis. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is employed to study the changes in productivity and efficiency experienced by the commercial banks during the period of study. Results show that: 1) LABs are more profitable than SCBs and RRBs; 2) LABs are less efficient than SCBs and RRBs; 3) productivity growth in SCBs, RRBs and LABs has been experiencing a downward trend. The paper also attempts to explain these results. Based on a reasonably long ten year period, the present study is expected to go a long way in determining the future viability of LABs through policy inferences derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Padmasai Arora & Hitesh Arora, 2016. "Performance of local area banks in India: an empirical study (2003-2012)," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 310-331.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:13:y:2016:i:3:p:310-331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78835
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:13:y:2016:i:3:p:310-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.