IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhdev/v9y2025i2p170-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Status effect or tunnel effect? Unravelling the dual role of relative income on subjective well-being among the Chinese population

Author

Listed:
  • Hania Fei Wu

Abstract

This paper examines subjective well-being in China, with a particular focus on the role of social comparison. Specifically, it examines the impact of relative income on the subjective well-being among the Chinese population from 2005 to 2018, a period characterised by rapid economic growth. By matching data from 10 rounds of the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) with the contextual income data from statistical yearbooks, we test the status effect and tunnel effect hypotheses. The analysis confirms the tunnel effect hypothesis: after controlling for individual income, the average income of the reference group has a positive effect on an individual's happiness; in addition, this positive effect substantially decreases and becomes insignificant after incorporating the objective measure of future income expectations. Our analysis provides empirical evidence for the tunnel effect and confirms that economic development can mitigate the negative effects of current inequality by raising people's hopes for future income growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Hania Fei Wu, 2025. "Status effect or tunnel effect? Unravelling the dual role of relative income on subjective well-being among the Chinese population," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 170-194.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:170-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=146262
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:170-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=395 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.