IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgsbu/v5y2013i4p225-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open innovation in German biotechnology - an empirical analysis of the management of innovation alliances

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Effelsberg

Abstract

Alliances in the field of innovation provide many opportunities for companies in research driven industries like biotechnology. As many of these alliances fail, alliance management has to be taken into consideration. Investigating drivers and conditions for successful innovation alliances can thus be helpful for profound decisions by managers, especially from small enterprises, representatives of biotechnology clusters or politicians responsible for governmental incentives. Based on a large-scale survey in German biotechnology, this article provides new insights into alliance formation and success. The results show that collaborative innovation is very common to cope with industry-specific challenges. Suppliers of information and customers are frequently selected partners and many firms belong to regional clusters. Alliance formation is related to a firm's absorptive capacity and to cultural aspects which reflect the reluctance to open up the innovation process. Alliance success is positively related to absorptive capacity and negatively related to an ineffective protection of intellectual property. Measures to improve absorptive capacity, to reduce the reluctance to collaborate and to protect intellectual property are introduced and managerial implications are derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Effelsberg, 2013. "Open innovation in German biotechnology - an empirical analysis of the management of innovation alliances," International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 225-255.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgsbu:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:225-255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgsbu:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:225-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=37 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.