IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgrec/v6y2012i2p167-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost and time overrun analysis for green construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Arun Chandramohan
  • S. Lakshmi Narayanan
  • Ashish Gaurav
  • Neethu Krishna

Abstract

Green construction projects are initiated in complex and dynamic environments resulting in circumstances of high level of uncertainty with respect to cost and duration. This is attributed to the fact that construction of green buildings requires stricter norms in terms of environmental conservation, carbon emission, construction footprint, pollution, etc. which can cause an addition to 'cost and duration'. This paper describes a systematic way to identify and quantify uncertainty in the green construction process based on the LEED rating system adopted by the Indian Green Building Council (IGBC). The system incorporates knowledge and experience acquired from many experts, project-specific information, decision analysis techniques, and a simulation model to predict risks for different green ratings in the construction schedule at the conception stage of a project. The model provides sensitivity analysis for different outcomes wherein the effect of critical and significant risk factors can be evaluated. The study focuses on lessons learned from past projects and describes a risk assessment process involving typical inputs and expected outputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Arun Chandramohan & S. Lakshmi Narayanan & Ashish Gaurav & Neethu Krishna, 2012. "Cost and time overrun analysis for green construction projects," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 167-177.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgrec:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:167-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgrec:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:167-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=158 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.