IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgrec/v4y2010i2p117-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The care paradox: devaluing and idealising care, the mother, and mother nature

Author

Listed:
  • Vinca Bigo

Abstract

Care work, such as that carried out by 'angelic' nurses, mothers, and other carers, is treated in a dualistic fashion: it is both idealised and poorly valued. The puzzling phenomenon before us is something of a paradox. The objective of this paper is to explain this hitherto unaddressed phenomenon. The explanation provided for the apparent contradictions draws on particular mechanisms inherent in the patriarchal system under which this paradoxical phenomenon occurs. Though the paper centres on care, nature is also both widely idealised and taken for granted. Thus, what is true of 'care' in our analysis is in more than one way also a story about 'nature'.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinca Bigo, 2010. "The care paradox: devaluing and idealising care, the mother, and mother nature," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 117-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgrec:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:117-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=35334
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Mussell, 2019. "Fiduciary - Asymmetrical Power, Asymmetrical Care," Working Papers wp511, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgrec:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:117-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=158 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.