IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgenv/v5y2005i1-2p78-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Precautionary Approach at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: the Southern Bluefin Tuna cases

Author

Listed:
  • Howard S. Schiffman

Abstract

The Southern Bluefin Tuna cases offer a rare judicial pronouncement on the application of the Precautionary Principle in marine conservation. Specifically, the 1999 application for provisional measures to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), initiated by Australia and New Zealand to limit a unilateral Japanese experimental fishing programme, yielded reasoned judicial guidance on Precaution in the law of the sea and marine fisheries. Apart from the contribution of the ITLOS' order of provisional measures itself, the separate opinions of Judges Laing, Treves and Shearer helped to define the contours of a "Precautionary approach" in a modern fisheries dispute. The fact that the order of provisional measures was ultimately dissolved by the later constituted arbitral tribunal for lack of jurisdiction need not detract from the ITLOS' important legal reasoning on the issue of Precaution. The enduring legacy of the cases will be their impact on the availability of ITLOS provisional measures to address fisheries' disputes in their preliminary phases, as well as illuminative judicial reasoning which will help to shape the application of the Precautionary Principle for many years to come.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard S. Schiffman, 2005. "The Precautionary Approach at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: the Southern Bluefin Tuna cases," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 78-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:78-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6264
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:78-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=14 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.