IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgenv/v5y2005i1-2p54-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy by analogy: precautionary principle, science and polybrominated diphenyl ethers

Author

Listed:
  • T. Gouin
  • S. Bocking
  • D. Mackay

Abstract

Through the acquisition of scientific data, knowledge is gained about the environmental fate and human exposure of chemical substances. From this knowledge, the risk of using chemicals can be assessed. As a means of facilitating the regulatory process, risk assessments can also compare the substance under investigation to other substances that display similar behaviour or structure, especially when the risk assessment involves a substance for which few data exist. For instance, similarities can be drawn between a number of poorly studied chemical substances and those that are currently listed as chemicals of concern. We suggest that policy can be guided, in part, by analogy. By taking advantage of knowledge obtained for the PCBs in the past, we can better implement precautionary measures with respect to similar substances, such as the PBDEs, and do so more quickly and appropriately.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Gouin & S. Bocking & D. Mackay, 2005. "Policy by analogy: precautionary principle, science and polybrominated diphenyl ethers," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 54-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:54-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6262
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:54-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=14 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.