IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgenv/v5y2005i1-2p36-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The precautionary principle: torn between biodiversity, environment-related food safety and the WTO

Author

Listed:
  • Makane Moïse Mbengue
  • Urs P. Thomas

Abstract

At the WTO, the precautionary principle/approach is considered as a protectionary mechanism, i.e. and alleged justification for potentially WTO-illegal trade restrictions. This article presents a survey of some pronouncements of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body including two case studies at opposite ends of the spectrum with regard to the operationalisation of the PP. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety has gone further than any other multilateral environmental agreement in specifying the application of precaution. It regulates the measures a member country may take in order to limit or ban the importation of living modified organisms such as seeds or GM commodities. On the other hand there is the Codex Alimentarius that is the WTO's reference point for food safety. Although it has discussed precautionary measures extensively, consensus looks unlikely here in the near future. We shall limit our discussion of the Codex to environment-related food safety, specifically GM food.

Suggested Citation

  • Makane Moïse Mbengue & Urs P. Thomas, 2005. "The precautionary principle: torn between biodiversity, environment-related food safety and the WTO," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 36-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:36-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6261
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:36-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=14 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.