IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer sovereignty, economic efficiency and the trade liberalisation debate


  • John M. Gowdy, Marsha L. Walton


In this paper, we examine the policies of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) as an example of the conflict in neoclassical theory between consumer sovereignty and efficiency in production. We begin by going to the roots of neoclassical theory, namely the axioms of consumer choice and the notion of "economic man". We argue that another caricature has appeared on the supply side of the demand-supply equation, namely the "economic commodity" whose characteristics, like those of its behavioural counterpart, imply that economic policies should be devoid of cultural and environmental context. In this view, the market economy is merely a Darwinian impartial arbitrator filtering out the inefficient firms and production techniques. We briefly examine the lineage of this view going back to "survival of the fittest" social Darwinism. WTO policies attempt to institutionalise "progress through increased efficiency" by ruling out any restriction of trade based on national sovereignty, or the social or environmental context of the commodity. We present evidence for this in WTO policy statements and we explore the conflict in neoclassical-based policy between the goals of consumer sovereignty and efficiency in production.

Suggested Citation

  • John M. Gowdy, Marsha L. Walton, 2003. "Consumer sovereignty, economic efficiency and the trade liberalisation debate," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:3:y:2003:i:1:p:1-13

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Maurie Cohen, 2011. "Is the UK preparing for “war”? Military metaphors, personal carbon allowances, and consumption rationing in historical perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 199-222, January.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:3:y:2003:i:1:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmel O'Grady). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.