IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Grounds for regulation and intervention in environmental matters: view of environmental and ecological economics

Listed author(s):
  • Roberto Fernandez Gago, Federico Marbella Sanchez
Registered author(s):

    The view taken by environmental economics of the environment tends to see it as having certain characteristics. Among these are that it is a free good, inexhaustible, belonging to nobody and without any form of regulatory price, in the absence of an exchange value. These characteristics lead to indiscriminate use and exploitation beyond what would be socially desirable, giving rise to negative externalities. Moreover, the absence of any contractual relationship between the numerous economic agents taking advantage of the environment, the difficulty of identifying them and of formalising and guaranteeing their respective obligations render unworkable potential negotiated solutions aimed at reducing undesirable economic effects (negative externalities). This justifies intervention and regulatory actions on the part of the authorities. For ecological economics, the environment interacts with the economic system through physical flows. It provides resources for productive activities and receives the residues arising from extraction, transformation and consumption processes. The links between the two systems raise questions of continuity or survival when an objective of uninterrupted growth in the economic system exhausts the resources the environment can provide. The matter should be considered in terms of sustainable development. Resolution of the problem through development that can be sustained requires the aim of economic growth to be made compatible with ecological equilibrium, sustained by the dynamic balance of physical variables. Fixing economic objectives and physical limits calls for multidisciplinary actions that would be hard to achieve and get accepted without regulatory intervention by the various States concerned. The problem of the environment exists at a global level and hence requires standards to have a worldwide homogeneous dimension, since there is no justification for fixing differing ecological objectives. In the European framework, there is broad consensus as to the need for homogeneity in environmental standards. The European Community Treaty assigned to the Community itself the mission of encouraging growth that would be sustainable and non-inflationary and respect the environment. In the case of Spain, the Constitution fixes the principles of the regulatory framework, imposing on the authorities responsibility for rational use and conferring on them powers to impose sanctions to this end. This framework is rounded out by standards set at State level and by the various Autonomous Regions in accordance with the division of competences envisaged by the Constitution itself.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Global Environmental Issues.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 104-121

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:1:y:2001:i:1:p:104-121
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:1:y:2001:i:1:p:104-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.