IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgeni/v43y2021i1p55-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of the Southern Corridor in the European energy security agenda and policy-making process

Author

Listed:
  • Fuad Farzalibeyov

Abstract

In the last decade, the Southern Gas Corridor (SGC) has captivated the energy agenda and shaped the geopolitics of the Southern and Eastern Europe. The primary rationale behind the SGC's development is an outstanding role this alternative corridor would play in the diversification of gas supply sources and enhancement of energy security in Europe. The current survey attempts to examine the evolution of the SGC initiative in the European energy security architecture and policy making process with a view to give insights on the actor impact prospects in this Corridor's future development. The competition for transportation of the Caspian gas to Europe has explicitly demonstrated that the overwhelming majority of decisions and agreements leading to the opening of SGC was initiated and promoted by state actors. The current survey implies the EU's enormous impetus to initiating, consistent supporting and advancing the Corridor, although its institutional impact on the final decision-making was not decisive. In conclusion, we attempted to elaborate the 'SGC Decision Tree' based on the decision-making model introduced by Richard C. Snyder, one of the pioneers of foreign policy analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuad Farzalibeyov, 2021. "Evolution of the Southern Corridor in the European energy security agenda and policy-making process," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 43(1), pages 55-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113454
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=13 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.