Measuring the performance of microfinance providers: an assessment of past and present practices
Measuring the performance of providers of financial services to poor individuals and to micro and small enterprises is a relatively new phenomenon, and the paper discusses the reasons for this. It is argued that using traditional financial ratios to assess performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) is inappropriate, owing to the high level of subsidies popular in the industry, which these measures ignore. In contrast, two performance measures that are becoming increasingly popular in the microfinance industry do attempt to adjust for subsidies granted to MFIs. These two performance measures, financial self sufficiency (FSS) and the subsidy dependence index (SDI), are compared and contrasted. The paper points to the superiority of the SDI over the FSS, and suggests the use of the outreach index alongside the SDI, to measure the degree to which the MFI has achieved social objectives.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 3 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=76|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijfsmg:v:3:y:2008:i:2:p:171-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.