IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v5y2013i2p168-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive literature review of effectuation theory from 1999 to 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Faiez Ghorbel
  • Younes Boujelbène

Abstract

Entrepreneurs are entrepreneurial, as differentiated from managerial or strategic, because they think effectually, as suggested by Dr. Saras Sarasvathy. For this reason, effectuation has attracted considerable research attention in the last decade. Central to Sarasvathy's effectuation are two building blocks: the science of the artificial, and the pragmatist method. Effectuation starts from the position that the future is contingent in which the essential characteristic of the future, in this view, is its unpredictability. Effectuation is based on transforming uncertainty into opportunities. Despite the widespread literature on this topic, efforts to review and analyse research on effectuation theory and practice are very limited. This literature review paper proposes a new conceptual classification scheme, in order to classify past and current developments in effectuation research. More than 120 papers published on effectuation studies from 1999 to 2011 were classified and analysed. For better effectuation-theory applications, researchers need to focus their effort on the empirical studies beside the theoretical developments, which are reached in advanced stages. Finally, this paper discusses some other future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Faiez Ghorbel & Younes Boujelbène, 2013. "A comprehensive literature review of effectuation theory from 1999 to 2011," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 168-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:168-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53593
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:168-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.