IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v1y2010i4p382-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-based cooperation relationships between SMEs – are family firms any different?

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Fink

Abstract

In current business literature, it has been shown in diverse contexts that committing oneself to maxims based on trust put in one's cooperation partner constitutes a successful entrepreneurial action. Against the backdrop of the growing interest in family firms, it seems worthwhile to ask whether or not this also holds true for this special group of firms. After a short introduction and a brief outline of the theoretical background of the effect of maxim-based trust on firm performance, we discuss the particularities of cooperation relationships of family firms and develop an argumentation on how these special characteristics might strengthen or weaken the performance contribution of maxim-based trust which results in the formulation of two hypotheses. A set of linear regression models and a Mann-Whitney U-test show that maxim-based trust significantly contributes to the performance of cooperating SME in Finland (n= 377), but no significant differences in this effect were detected between non-family firms and family firms. Thus, we can encourage family firms to engage in trust-based cooperation relationships, as this is obviously also an attractive strategy to enhance the performance in family firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Fink, 2010. "Trust-based cooperation relationships between SMEs – are family firms any different?," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 382-397.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:1:y:2010:i:4:p:382-397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=32539
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:1:y:2010:i:4:p:382-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.