IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v1y2010i3p309-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How venture capital investors view radical strategic change in high technology new ventures

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Gimmon
  • Eyal Benjamin
  • Liora Katzenstein

Abstract

Radical strategic change, a common event in high technology new ventures, presents a conflict between potential opportunity and the risk of departing from a planned and approved strategy. This study explores investors' perspectives regarding RSC in their portfolio companies, based on interviews of 13 private investors who are active venture capitalists or business angels. The study explores the investors' views based on three theories of VC-entrepreneur relationships: agency theory, stewardship theory and game theory. The findings indicate three approaches taken by investors: avoidance, expectation and passivity. Since the success of radical strategic change is critical to venture performance, it is suggested that investors adopt the expectation approach, which optimises the prisoner's dilemma inherent in the VC-entrepreneur relationship during such events. The findings of this exploratory study indicate the need for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Gimmon & Eyal Benjamin & Liora Katzenstein, 2010. "How venture capital investors view radical strategic change in high technology new ventures," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 309-326.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:309-326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30979
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:309-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.