IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v13y2021i4p319-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When opportunity knocks: how the individual opportunity nexus explains evaluations of new business models

Author

Listed:
  • Christian D. Klusmann
  • Patrick Spieth
  • Sascha Klein

Abstract

The business model concept represents an important assisting mechanism in the venture creation process. However, in the light of opportunity evaluation - a fundamental concept in entrepreneurship literature - the role of the business model lacks clarity. Therefore, we synergise insights from entrepreneurship and business model research. In contrast to previous research that emphasised the antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions, we propose and test quantitatively a causal model with an experimental research design, concerning the link between an individual's general entrepreneurial intention and the evaluation of opportunities. Additionally, we investigate the moderating influence of cognitive decision-making patterns, allowing to contribute to the understanding of cognitive biases in the venture creation. Finally, our empirical investigation offers contributions to both entrepreneurship and business model research by highlighting the role of the business model as an opportunity evaluation concept that accounts for intentional and cognitive differences of individual entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian D. Klusmann & Patrick Spieth & Sascha Klein, 2021. "When opportunity knocks: how the individual opportunity nexus explains evaluations of new business models," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 319-345.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:319-345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117922
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:319-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.