IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetpo/v9y2013i1p53-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the potential of using photovoltaic panels in a typical Mauritian household

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh Surroop
  • Rushnee Guriah

Abstract

With the depletion of fossil fuel reserves and rise in the price of oil, it has become of utmost importance for Mauritius, which is highly dependent on those resources, to seek for alternative energy sources to meet its growing energy demand. Being a small island developing state, Mauritius is also highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Solar energy, which is clean, inexhaustible and environmentally friendly, has emerged as a promising renewable energy source for power generation. This study was therefore initiated to assess the potential of using photovoltaic (PV) panels in a typical Mauritian household, mainly for a middle income family. The average monthly peak electricity demand of a middle income family was 171 kWh with base load of 0.3 kW. The most appropriate PV system was found to be a 1.2 kW system where 25% of the solar power produced would meet the household needs and the rest would be fed to the grid. The payback was found to be 5.34 years at a feed in tariff (FiT) of $0.70/kWh. Environmentally, such systems would save 2.60 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually and would also reduce the load on the utility grid, as part of the power would be generated by the customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh Surroop & Rushnee Guriah, 2013. "Assessment of the potential of using photovoltaic panels in a typical Mauritian household," International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 53-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetpo:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:53-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55818
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetpo:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:53-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=12 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.