IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v9y2008i1p47-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofiltration of hydrophobic VOCs pretreated with UV photolysis and photocatalysis

Author

Listed:
  • Madjid Mohseni
  • Lizbeth Prieto

Abstract

The effects of pretreatments on the biofiltration of gas phase α-pinene, a poorly water soluble Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), was evaluated in a controlled and long-term experimental investigation. Ultraviolet (UV) photolysis and photocatalysis were used and compared as pretreatment techniques. A control experiment involving biofiltration alone allowed for the direct evaluation of the coupled UV-biofiltration. α-Pinene contaminated streams with flow rates of 5–6.5 l/min and concentrations of up to 130 ppmv were passed through the systems. UV pretreatment on average converted between 20 and 50% of α-pinene into water soluble intermediates. When comparing the effectiveness of each pretreatment process, UV photocatalysis provided greater α-pinene conversion, especially at low retention times and high contaminant loading. The untreated α-pinene along with the by-products of UV photooxidation was then removed effectively in the biofiltration stage. The UV-biofiltration process offered 50–80% more α-pinene removal compared to the control biofilter. Regardless of their effectiveness at removing the contaminant, photolysis and photocatalysis pretreatments had similar synergistic impact on the performance of the downstream biofilter.

Suggested Citation

  • Madjid Mohseni & Lizbeth Prieto, 2008. "Biofiltration of hydrophobic VOCs pretreated with UV photolysis and photocatalysis," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 47-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:9:y:2008:i:1:p:47-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=17859
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Dobslaw & Oliver Ortlinghaus, 2020. "Biological Waste Air and Waste Gas Treatment: Overview, Challenges, Operational Efficiency, and Current Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:9:y:2008:i:1:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.