IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v3y2003i3-4p368-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus building and knowledge integration methods applied to technology implementation in the Swiss waste incineration industry

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Sell
  • Roland W. Scholz

Abstract

This paper describes the use of consensus-building and knowledge integration methods to reflect stakeholders' preferences. These methods were applied in a complex decision making process concerned with the implementation of innovative technologies in Swiss waste incineration plants. We described stakeholders' preferences by integrating their knowledge into a multi-criteria evaluation of technologies and assessment of various waste management strategies. Subsequently, the stakeholders participated in a consensus-building workshop on future waste management strategies and on strategic roles stakeholder groups occupy within the Swiss waste sector. Finally, technology suppliers validated the outcomes of the technology evaluation and workshop. We found that stakeholders differ in their opinion of what strategies should be used to develop and design the Swiss waste sector in future. However, they vary little with regard to the evaluation of different types of technologies. Choosing appropriate technologies was less important than setting up appropriate framework conditions that design the waste management sector. Some of the proposed framework conditions (e.g. periodical market analysis for technologies and reusable residues) were adopted by the Canton of Zurich in its future decision-making on waste technology implementation. In addition, the study brought important insights and impulses for the stakeholders' network and designed future collaboration opportunities in the Swiss waste incineration sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Sell & Roland W. Scholz, 2003. "Consensus building and knowledge integration methods applied to technology implementation in the Swiss waste incineration industry," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 368-389.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:3:y:2003:i:3/4:p:368-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lang, Daniel J. & Binder, Claudia R. & Scholz, Roland W. & Schleiss, Konrad & Stäubli, Beat, 2006. "Impact factors and regulatory mechanisms for material flow management: Integrating stakeholder and scientific perspectives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 101-132.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:3:y:2003:i:3/4:p:368-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.