IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v3y2003i2p166-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental impact assessment of bathroom products

Author

Listed:
  • X. William Xu, Ross Galloway

Abstract

It has been recognised worldwide that previous patterns of industrial production have been causing resource depletion and waste accumulation. To address the issue, not only the selection of materials, but also the cycle of stages in the life of a product, are subject to scrutiny. These stages may include resource extraction, manufacturing, packaging and shipping, use and refurbishment. This paper presents an effective Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) tool called EPS (Environmental Priorities Strategies) system for non-LCA practitioners such as design engineers, production engineers, business decision makers and purchasing staff to use. Bathroom products have been experiencing major changes in the past 40 years in the areas of both material selection and manufacturing technology, though little has been done in justifying such changes from the environmental perspective other than from the commercial perspective. Hence, the EPS method is used to perform a complete LCA on the two dominant types of shower trays, enamelled steel and acrylic. The comparative study shows that the lifecycle environmental impact of enamelled steel shower trays is likely to be greater than that of acrylic shower trays at the 84% confidence level. Similar conclusions can be drawn for other bathroom products, e.g. bathtubs and whirlpool baths, due to the similarities among their material compositions and manufacturing processes.

Suggested Citation

  • X. William Xu, Ross Galloway, 2003. "Environmental impact assessment of bathroom products," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 166-184.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:3:y:2003:i:2:p:166-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=3396
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:3:y:2003:i:2:p:166-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.