IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v21y2018i1-2p37-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of changes in opinion from an expert workshop on turbidity in drinking water supplies and acute gastrointestinal illness

Author

Listed:
  • Arjita Rai
  • Patrick L. Gurian
  • Michelle C. Kondo
  • Issa Zakeri
  • Lucy Robinson
  • Anneclaire J. De Roos

Abstract

Several epidemiological studies have found associations between turbidity in drinking water supplies and acute gastrointestinal illness, although these results have been controversial. This project sought to critically evaluate these epidemiological studies through a workshop of multidisciplinary subject matter experts. Pre- and post-workshop surveys were conducted to assess any changes in opinion occurring after the one-day workshop where issues identified in the literature review were discussed. Changes were mostly small, non-significant shifts toward less favourable views of the studies. The only significant change was a shift weak agreement to weak disagreement with the statement that more should be done to ensure US drinking water quality. Responses to questions differed significantly by affiliation, discipline, and by role in the study. The survey results indicate that the workshop did not produce consensus among the participants. The survey provided a means of documenting differences in opinions expressed by all workshop attendees.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjita Rai & Patrick L. Gurian & Michelle C. Kondo & Issa Zakeri & Lucy Robinson & Anneclaire J. De Roos, 2018. "An evaluation of changes in opinion from an expert workshop on turbidity in drinking water supplies and acute gastrointestinal illness," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1/2), pages 37-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:21:y:2018:i:1/2:p:37-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92560
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:21:y:2018:i:1/2:p:37-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.