IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v8y2009i3p361-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

London's congestion charging scheme and the growth and survival of the minicab sector

Author

Listed:
  • Nnamdi O. Madichie
  • Nicholas A. Alli

Abstract

Although new businesses are at the heart of economic growth, their survival rates have been rather abysmal. While Frankish et al. (2006) – in their paper Charting the Valley of Death – provided a revised 'proportional hazards model' in their consideration of business survival and closure, Langdon's (2006) research on the business birthrate strategy and economic development highlighted the failures of the public sector and policy makers with regards to micro businesses as a high priority matter. However, none of these studies considered the candidature of the minicab sector as a possible new venture with rather high and largely externally driven, mortality rates. Using in-depth interviews and the narratives of minicab operators in London, we evaluate the claim that London's congestion charging scheme introduced on 17 February 2003 has been a blessing to this latent small business sector. Our primary focuses is to evaluate the impact of London congestion charging scheme on the acclaimed uncharged fares category (i.e., minicabs in this case). We conclude the paper by suggesting that this sector is worthy of consideration in any impact analysis and/or assessment of the charge scheme – especially as they 'chart their valley of death'.

Suggested Citation

  • Nnamdi O. Madichie & Nicholas A. Alli, 2009. "London's congestion charging scheme and the growth and survival of the minicab sector," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 361-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:8:y:2009:i:3:p:361-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:8:y:2009:i:3:p:361-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.