IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v51y2024i2p238-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability and market analysis of the piggery industry in the Prestea/Huni-Valley Municipality of Western Region, Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Afotey Anang
  • Anthony Anning

Abstract

The study aimed at determining the profitability and market analysis of the piggery industry in the Prestea/Huni-Valley Municipality of Western Region, Ghana. Using purposive and snowball sampling methods, the study engaged 20 pig farmers and 130 pork consumers in the study area. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis were employed to analyse the data. The study revealed that pensioners on full time basis mostly undertake the piggery industry, which is highly dominated by male and small-scale farmers. The industry was found to be profitable with 44% gross margin and profitability index of 1.05, but the industry is stifled with challenges such as feeding cost and availability of labour. Access to markets was found not to be a challenge, but farmers are to diversify their products, and improve upon feeding and sanitation. Again, efforts by corporate bodies and government to subsidize input costs will make the industry more lucrative to create more jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Afotey Anang & Anthony Anning, 2024. "Profitability and market analysis of the piggery industry in the Prestea/Huni-Valley Municipality of Western Region, Ghana," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 51(2), pages 238-256.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:238-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135708
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:238-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.