IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v30y2017i4p608-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional asymmetry as a challenge in tackling the grey economy in Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Anton Kojouharov
  • Rositsa Dzhekova

Abstract

Since EU accession in 2007, Bulgaria has ranked as the member state with the largest informal economy of some 31% of GDP. Despite diverse policy measures applied to crack down on tax evasion and undeclared work, some 'grey' practices, such as under-reporting salaries and turnover have flourished recently. The aim of this paper is to critically assess the effectiveness of the dominant policy approach in Bulgaria to tackle the shadow economy. It argues that the role of low tax morale and the high level of institutional incongruence have been neglected as drivers for widespread social legitimacy of informality. The strong focus of the authorities in recent years on administrative control measures creates a vicious circle in the long term - increasing the power of the state through deterrence while failing to guarantee procedural and redistributive fairness or highlight the benefits of compliance create an even greater mistrust by economic actors. Instead, the paper calls for considering an 'indirect' approach as an alternative strategy, by promoting voluntary commitment through pursuing a change in social norms and values, but also increasing the legitimacy of institutions and the quality of public goods and services to reduce the gap between taxpayers and the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton Kojouharov & Rositsa Dzhekova, 2017. "Institutional asymmetry as a challenge in tackling the grey economy in Bulgaria," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(4), pages 608-628.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:30:y:2017:i:4:p:608-628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82920
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:30:y:2017:i:4:p:608-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.