IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v28y2016i2-3p359-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What determines enterprises' technical efficiency? An empirical investigation of informal enterprises in Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Denis B. Akouwerabou

Abstract

Although the creation rate of new informal enterprises is very high in the cities of developing countries, the bankruptcy rate of such enterprises is also significant. This article studies the determinants of the growth rate and technical inefficiency of informal production units (IPUs). The data used in this study were collected from enterprises in Ouagadougou based on a survey of informal enterprises in the business of hairdressing, two-wheeled mechanics, carpentry, and sewing. Analysis of the data showed that IPUs run by skilled entrepreneurs are less dynamic than those run by non-qualified entrepreneurs in the short run. Detailed results further showed that qualified entrepreneurs conducting business in the informal sector expect the formal sector to offer a more profitable opportunity than the informal sector. Our data also showed that the IPUs become more inefficient as their workers contract more diseases. However, having qualified workers enables IPUs to reduce technical inefficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis B. Akouwerabou, 2016. "What determines enterprises' technical efficiency? An empirical investigation of informal enterprises in Burkina Faso," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(2/3), pages 359-379.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:28:y:2016:i:2/3:p:359-379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76644
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:28:y:2016:i:2/3:p:359-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.