IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijepee/v14y2021i5-6p536-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of sentiments on stock returns, volatility and liquidity

Author

Listed:
  • Divya Verma Gakhar
  • Shweta Kundlia

Abstract

This study aims to predict stock characteristics such as returns, volatility, and liquidity of companies involved in sustainable investments, using sentiment analysis. The paper uses lexicon-based sentiment analysis and develops regression-based predictive models for testing the impact of Twitter sentiments on stock market movements using four sentiment scores (positive, negative, total, and directional). It is found that positive Twitter sentiments are better able to predict stock returns and volatility than liquidity. While negative sentiment scores can better predict volatility and liquidity than stock returns. All stock market variables are found to be significantly affected by the total number of tweets, i.e., posting volumes. Our study suggests that investors investing in companies with sustainability interests tend to keep track on their corporate social platforms, and thus, companies involved in sustainable investments should remain active on social networking platforms such as Twitter to maintain their corporate image and enhance social value.

Suggested Citation

  • Divya Verma Gakhar & Shweta Kundlia, 2021. "Impact of sentiments on stock returns, volatility and liquidity," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(5/6), pages 536-565.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:14:y:2021:i:5/6:p:536-565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:14:y:2021:i:5/6:p:536-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=219 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.