IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijepee/v10y2017i1p12-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Researchers' viewpoints towards commercialisation of agricultural technology for community development

Author

Listed:
  • Narissara Muangsawang
  • Rath Pichyangkura
  • Adchara Chandrachai
  • Orasuda Charoenrath

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to study factors that should be taken into consideration while conducting research on agricultural technology for utilisation in community development. The sample consisted of 90 agricultural technology researchers from all over the country. Questionnaires were used as the research tool for data collection to be mailed directly to those units of analysis together with a self-addressed envelope. Outstanding research outcomes were as follows: researchers with and without the experience on the agricultural technology utilisation had different viewpoints toward the community's absorptive capacity with the significance of 0.05 for four factors, i.e., knowledge acquisition by means of the support from public organisations/institution, viewpoint toward the community's agricultural technology selection in consideration of economic benefits, viewpoint toward the technology selection in consideration of the disseminated technology helping reduce work steps and time and viewpoint toward the community's learning level in consideration of the number of learning sources in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Narissara Muangsawang & Rath Pichyangkura & Adchara Chandrachai & Orasuda Charoenrath, 2017. "Researchers' viewpoints towards commercialisation of agricultural technology for community development," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 12-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:12-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83892
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:12-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=219 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.