IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijenma/v5y2012i2p126-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open innovation of consensus standard - cases of business model creation in ICT

Author

Listed:
  • Masami Kajiura

Abstract

Recently, technical standardisation has shifted from de facto to consensus standard in information communication technology (ICT). Moreover, the number of enterprises declaring patents in the standardisation process has increased. This paper verifies the 'strategy option of standards and patents' in consensus standardisation from the aspect of open innovation. Two case studies of Mitsubishi Electric, a multinational company in Japan, were presented. Both case studies use the consensus standardisation process and achieve open innovation. Closed innovation was assumed to be an initial innovation source in the consensus standardisation. Two open coupled innovation elements were introduced. A high-capability enterprise formed the outside institute that generate the innovation when the best innovation could not be procured from outside. Achieving an open innovation was then attempted.

Suggested Citation

  • Masami Kajiura, 2012. "Open innovation of consensus standard - cases of business model creation in ICT," International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 126-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijenma:v:5:y:2012:i:2:p:126-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shukuan Zhao & Yu Sun & Xiaobo Xu, 2016. "Research on open innovation performance: a review," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 279-287, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijenma:v:5:y:2012:i:2:p:126-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=187 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.