IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijelfi/v9y2019i4p257-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevance of e-SERVQUAL for determining the quality of FinTech services

Author

Listed:
  • Hasnan Baber

Abstract

Despite the rise of FinTech, the definition of this sector is still vague. The services offered by FinTech differ widely, but all share some commonalities. As FinTech is a growing service sector, there is a need to check the service quality offered by the different service providers. The study was conducted on Islamic banks of Malaysia and UAE which offer Fintech services to their customers. A 26-item questionnaire was used to gather data from 325 customers by strata sampling. Statistical data was analysed through various tests like reliability analysis, sample adequacy, factor analysis and regression analysis using SPSS 25.0. Shariah compliance variable was added to the e-SERVQUAL model to make it relevant for Islamic banks. This study found that Shariah compliance information, site aesthetic, efficient and reliable services, and fulfilment of promises and transaction has a significant impact on the customer satisfaction in Islamic banks for the FinTech services offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasnan Baber, 2019. "Relevance of e-SERVQUAL for determining the quality of FinTech services," International Journal of Electronic Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 257-267.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:257-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Egi Arvian Firmansyah & Masairol Masri & Muhammad Anshari & Mohd Hairul Azrin Besar, 2022. "Factors Affecting Fintech Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:257-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=171 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.