IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijelfi/v2y2008i1p82-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online music piracy's controversy: pay sites versus free, who will prevail?

Author

Listed:
  • Alan D. Smith

Abstract

Online piracy may substantially undermine intellectual property rights of digital goods. There is much controversy concerning the issue of music piracy over the internet and the implementation of new information technology in Customer Relationship Management (CRM) with the rebirth of Napster and other pay sites. In particular, the exchange of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) electronic commerce is fast gaining acceptance in the user community. This paper concentrates on the music industry. In recent years, with the rapid growth of the internet, the situation of music piracy has become increasingly serious. File-sharing technologies have created new market dynamics and posed a great challenge to the music industry to try and retain customers. Consumers have created anonymous online networks to exchange audio files at little cost. This has led to millions of shared, illegal copies of music files and related sales losses to the industry. Legal efforts to counter this trend have lagged the advances in technology. Factor analysis and related hypothesis-testing procedures of 285 professionals in the service sector in the Pittsburgh, PA have uncovered several interesting scenarios of traditional music store selling with those of online-based strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan D. Smith, 2008. "Online music piracy's controversy: pay sites versus free, who will prevail?," International Journal of Electronic Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 82-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:82-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=16886
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:82-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=171 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.