IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijelfi/v14y2025i4p432-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Develop a critical success factor framework for improving requirement elicitation impacting software quality management

Author

Listed:
  • S.P. Udhayakumar
  • M. Sivasubramanian

Abstract

The requirements engineering (RE) process is not specifically covered in any of the existing software process improvement (SPI) standards, which instead treat it as one of several activities that make up the entire development process. According to research, improving the RE process has to receive more attention if excellent software is to be produced. This research expanded the idea of crucial success elements in order to enhance the RE process (CSFs). Using the quantitative method, the survey has been conducted. Our findings demonstrate that the elements of the requirement elicitation process, like stakeholders' interest, stakeholder's knowledge, stakeholder's role, negotiation capacity, learning capacity, perceived utility factors, and semi-autonomous influence the quality of software development. Additionally, this study finds the moderating impact of communication skills on the relationship between the requirement elicitation process and Software quality development. Our findings also discussed that CSFs across practitioner groups share more characteristics than they do variances. It demonstrates that RE professionals are aware of the perception of IT employees towards the Requirement engineering for process improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • S.P. Udhayakumar & M. Sivasubramanian, 2025. "Develop a critical success factor framework for improving requirement elicitation impacting software quality management," International Journal of Electronic Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 432-453.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:432-453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=149163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:432-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=171 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.