Author
Listed:
- R. Smailes, S.Y. Cooper, W. Keogh
Abstract
Business start-up through the incubation process from the university sector is normally focused on the high-tech, potential high-growth end of the market. Successes from key centres worldwide include the excellent record of Stanford and MIT. Closer to home, the university and science park links at the University of Twente in Holland are often cited as good practice. Best practice universities appear to have some areas in common, for example, sources of funds, networking, mentoring and student recruitment. The Scottish university sector has been criticised in the past for not performing to the standards achieved elsewhere and the purpose of the exploratory research outlined in this paper is to determine how well the Scottish universities perform when compared with the best. Data gathered from the top universities in the USA illustrates that a number of key benchmarks are in operation. These include the number of spin-outs, the number of patents filed and the volume of sponsored research. For example, in 1997, the top 11 averaged nine spin-outs, 163 patents filed and $588.5m sponsored research. These figures are between three to four times greater than the average of the whole population included in the US survey. The averages from a sample of Scottish universities revealed three spin-outs, 14 patents filed and $49.5m in sponsored research. This paper explores the underlying data, examines the differences and presents arguments for a change in the policy direction for spin-outs and expectations from commercialisation of university incubator organisations.
Suggested Citation
R. Smailes, S.Y. Cooper, W. Keogh, 2002.
"Supporting university enterprise: the Scottish and US experience,"
International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4/5), pages 354-372.
Handle:
RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:2:y:2002:i:4/5:p:354-372
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:2:y:2002:i:4/5:p:354-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.