IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v27y2023i1-2p119-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University technology transfer: assessment of invention disclosures by technology transfer offices

Author

Listed:
  • António Rocha
  • Maria Manuela Cruz-Cunha
  • Fernando Romero

Abstract

University technology transfer offices (TTOs) encourage researchers to disclose their inventive results to assess their novelty, industrial applicability, and inventive step to protect and devise a plan to gather the necessary resources for its deployment. To describe the invention disclosure process and to gain knowledge about assessment practices to understand the invention, its market, potential for transfer, and accessibility to finance, Portuguese university TTOs were asked to provide information on their internal processes through a semi- structured survey. The most frequent practices have been identified, including, the analysis of all the technology applications, the assessment of the technology readiness level, patentability, strength of its claims, and protection costs; assessment of the extent of technology demand and potential licensees; and analysis of available sources of finance. The approach was essentially descriptive and exploratory to convey information on how to proceed to guide the initial evaluation that triggers the valorisation process.

Suggested Citation

  • António Rocha & Maria Manuela Cruz-Cunha & Fernando Romero, 2023. "University technology transfer: assessment of invention disclosures by technology transfer offices," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(1/2), pages 119-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:27:y:2023:i:1/2:p:119-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=129328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:27:y:2023:i:1/2:p:119-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.