IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v9y2015i3p254-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political embeddedness, market-oriented autonomy, and failure of business groups during China's state-led institutional transition

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Zhang
  • Yan Wang

Abstract

In this study, we focus on important organisational features and institutional conditions underlying the prosperity of business groups, and propose a new approach to analysing the distinctive roles of business groups during market-oriented institutional transitions. We examine the likelihood of failure of business groups initiated with varying degrees of political embeddedness and market-oriented autonomy, and the institutional contingency of interactive organisational mechanisms in the context of China. Specifically, we conduct empirical tests using data from Chinese textile business groups. The results of our Cox regression analyses show the complexity of the proposed organisational and institutional mechanisms. It is possible for market-oriented autonomy to dominate political embeddedness in determining the overall prosperity of business groups. However, the effect of organisational mechanisms is highly contingent on the specific institutional conditions that confront a business group.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Zhang & Yan Wang, 2015. "Political embeddedness, market-oriented autonomy, and failure of business groups during China's state-led institutional transition," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 254-273.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:9:y:2015:i:3:p:254-273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68547
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:9:y:2015:i:3:p:254-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.