IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v3y2011i6p623-640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is employment of social risk groups the key to sustaining the European welfare regimes?

Author

Listed:
  • Kosta Josifidis
  • Novica Supic
  • Emilija Beker Pucar
  • Sladjana Srdic

Abstract

The European welfare regimes face two sets of challenges. One internal, specific for the welfare state itself, and the other external, imposed by changing economic, political and economics conditions. The first challenge lies in the growing gap between the rigid welfare state design and flexible social demands. Due to their unpredictable nature, the second challenge has received more attention in comparative welfare state studies. The core of the actual welfare state crisis is allocated in the economic problems that can be synthesised as the unemployment problem. Following this logic, in this paper we promote the thesis that employment of social risk groups is the key for sustaining the European welfare regimes. When the level of employment of poverty risk groups is high and the level of unemployment is low, more people contribute to the welfare state and the less draw on it, making any given level of redistribution more sustainable. Along with theoretical consideration, we use the balanced panel of 14 EU countries from 1995 to 2006 in order to provide some evidences that could support this thesis empirically.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosta Josifidis & Novica Supic & Emilija Beker Pucar & Sladjana Srdic, 2011. "Is employment of social risk groups the key to sustaining the European welfare regimes?," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(6), pages 623-640.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:3:y:2011:i:6:p:623-640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:3:y:2011:i:6:p:623-640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.